BIN 1999, 1 -- Hand 6

[awm]

This hand reserves the top spot for playing 3S in a 3-3 fit. It seems like 3NT is pretty good on the likely club lead, and has some play even if they find a spade lead, yet 3NT receives a zero. Perhaps 3NT and 3S should have the opposite scores.

There's also a failure to explain the 2C opening and 3C raise by opponents -- since many people do play 2C as a strong artificial bid, it may be worth explaining them as "natural."

[woody]

Thanks for telling me. Of course it should have been 3NT=10, not 3S...